In Brave New World, language has been changed in many ways. In Brave New World, individuals barely exist in the first place: There are some didactic passages here, too, most pointedly when Mustapha Mond explains how the World State functions, but this is more carefully integrated into the storyline than is The Book.
His purpose was not to imagine the details of such technologies, but to present the use to which they are put. Orwell posits a certain level of technological advance—the two-way television screens and the ever-present surveillance equipment, the novel-writing machines, but not much else.
They are so unimportant that they are not even individuals at all, but are bred in batches called Bokanovsky Groups, dozens of identical specimens at a time. In his World State, humans are engendered and grown in artificial wombs. In fact, advances in reproductive science and cloning technologies have made it appear all the more prescient.
The scene in which lower-caste babies are conditioned by terror and pain into a loathing of books and flowers demonstrates that under the smooth surface, this society can be as ruthless as the Party. There are the Reservations, where primitives live and practise a quite different lifestyle; there are also islands, to which awkward members of society can be sent if necessary.
Huxley goes considerably further in imagining scientific advance. He is logically correct in realising that they could do so, but at the same time it is clear that the proles are extremely unlikely to take such action.
Then a crowd of sightseers come to see him, and treat him as though he were an exhibit at the zoo, chanting at him to use the whip, and turning his frenzied behaviour with Lenina into an orgy. Essentially, the Party manages to persuade its members that mere feelings are of no account.
Huxley extrapolates the trend for elective childbearing until it becomes grotesque: In addition, there is the resonance of the presence of death. Again, however, the author is not attempting to present a detailed picture of what life would be like in the far distant future; he is showing the effects of such things on human nature.
Compare and contrast the two novels as visions of a future that has gone dramatically wrong. They address many of the same issues—language, control, production, sex, and so forth—and simply treat them in quite different ways.
Brave New World, being set much further into the future, has not been overtaken by events in the same way. Winston considers sex to be a political act, an expression of freedom. Sexual activity is discouraged, and divorced from pleasure. Though perhaps we do not know enough about other societies to know whether they are perpetuating this kind of environment.
To both authors, this lack of decent human feeling means the death of art. They do not strive. The style and presentation of these novels varies quite considerably. The society presented in is less comfortably balanced. In the tenth dictionary of Newspeak, we are told, certain words have been made obsolete—the opposite of what naturally happens to a language, for words become obsolete because they have ceased to be used, rather than because they have been erased.
And although the effect of such a society is to dehumanise human beings, removing their need to strive, and keeping them emotionally immature all their lives, it is at least apparently done for a benign purpose.
As a result of the insistent reduction of human feelings to the least possible level, the people in both societies treat other people as objects and do not experience decent emotions with regard to them.
Yet Winston does retain a normal human dread of actual death: In Oceania, sex is treated in a quite opposite manner. There are, interestingly, some moments of close correspondence between the books.
Brave New World presents a less taut, less tense story, and the story-line moves from one focus character to another: The members of the World State do not grow and mature, and they never really come to terms with death.
Essentially, Winston has been conditioned to behave with craven selfishness. Brave New World and were both written by men who had experienced war on the grand scale of the twentieth century. Moreover, there are no islands to which nonconformists can be sent—it is clear that the two balancing powers of Eurasia and Eastasia are identical in their repressiveness to Oceania.
Of the two, I find Brave New World the more enjoyable read, mostly because it is not completely devoid of hope.And Brave New World In Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Huxley's Brave New World, the authoritative figures strive for freedom, peace, and stability for all, to develop a utopian society.
Comparison of A Brave New World and A Brave New World is a story about Bernard Marx, who rejects his society because he finds that he is not satisfied with living a controlled life. is a story about Winston who finds forbidden love within the restrictions of his society.
Topics: Nineteen Eighty-Four, Brave New World, In contrast, Brave New World focuses on making people happy with their assigned place in life.
They are conditioned from decanting through childhood with the prejudice and social values determined by the ten world leaders.
Dystopian books and films are in the zeitgeist. Reflecting the often dark mood of our times, Intelligence Squared are staging a contest between two of the greatest dystopian novels, Brave New World and Nineteen ultimedescente.com book captured the nightmares of the s and 40s.
21 rows · Brave New World is a dystopian novel, which extrapolated from the rise of technology. Comparing and Brave New World Essay - Comparing Orwell's and Huxley's Brave New World In Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and Huxley’s Brave New World, the authoritative figures strive for freedom, peace, and stability for all, to develop a utopian society.Download