A study on the concept of groupthink

Avoiding Groupthink

When a team member expresses an opposing opinion or questions the rationale behind a decision, the rest of the team members work together to pressure or penalize that person into compliance.

When this group has the same set of values and faces the same crisis situation, then everyone is put under great stress. Paribas basically pressured him out, and six years later he is unemployed.

Both presidents sought the advice of experts outside of their political groups more than Janis suggested. General group problem-solving GGPS model[ edit ] Aldag and Fuller argue that the groupthink concept was based on a "small and relatively restricted sample" that became too broadly generalized.

Governance issues are so much more profound than the simplistic legal and accounting rule-making that we often see from governance enthusiasts. First, not all alternatives are considered and accorded full merit.

Here the author quotes another important statement in light of current events. To have somebody playing the good-governance cop and the rest of the group going off their own merry way is very dangerous and unproductive.

I find his closing remark telling and it would also mark the closing remark for this article: When morality is used as a basis for decision-making, the pressure to conform is even greater because no individual wants to be perceived as immoral. And the harsher the preferred policy -- the more likely it was to involve moral dilemma -- the more zealously members clung to their consensus: Has at least one contingency plan.

Into that arena stepped my late colleague, Irving Janis, who pointed out that sometimes groups make very, very bad decisions. Then that person gets typecast. We know how the Bay of Pigs invasion, the Vietnam war and the Iraq war have gone.

Individual decision making represented autocracy, whereas decisions by groups meant partnership, collaboration, and teamwork.

These factors range from causal to effectual and focus on group and situational aspects. What he found was that a lack of conflict or opposing viewpoints led to poor decisions, because alternatives were not fully analyzed, and because groups did not gather enough information to make an informed decision.

If so, you have probably been a victim of "Groupthink". Intense pressure from the outside to make a good decision. That is already a favorite charge of left-leaning pundits, especially so after the release of State of Denial: By following these guidelines, groupthink can be avoided.

Janis died in Check your understanding of the concept of groupthink with this interactive quiz and printable worksheet. Use the questions to locate study points. Groupthink can severely undermine the value of a group's work and, at its worst, it can cost people their lives.

On a lesser scale, it can stifle teamwork, and leave all but the most vocal team members disillusioned and dissatisfied. the groupthink concept. It reviews example applications, identifies proposed For example, Ahlstrom and Wang () completed a study using the groupthink model to assess Franceā€˜s defeat by Germany in They essentially limited their assessment to only the groupthink symptoms and did not address other elements of the groupthink.

Group Behaviors. STUDY. PLAY. Based on the concept of groupthink, what is the most likely response of Ralph's group to the new member's proposal? Ralph and his group will quickly reject the old method.

Which of the following situations reflect the.

Groupthink

this case study approach to the groupthink research still falls short of completely addressing this decision-making This article examines the fundamentals and concepts of Groupthink practices and their structural effects on Decision making of Managers.

Groupthink is a term first used in by social psychologist Irving L. Janis that refers to a psychological phenomenon in which people strive for consensus within a group.

In many cases, people will set aside their own personal beliefs or .

Download
A study on the concept of groupthink
Rated 0/5 based on 76 review