Key Differences In democracy, ruler come through a free and fair election process while dictator comes according to his own will.
Most of the African and Asian countries are examples of dictatorship while western countries are the examples of democracy. Freedom is also a huge aspect of democracy. Dictatorships have a flexibility in economic policy that breeds growth Dictatorships have the flexibility to establish the proper incentives to attract Foreign Direct Investment which is directly attached to Economic Growth, and by consequence, to Development [[http: Democracy is the most acceptable principle of governance in most of the countries.
There is always the probability of innocent people getting convicted often due to lack of proper cross examination in the case of dictatorship.
Dictatorship is not a prerequisite for Democracy. English Puritans who migrated from established colonies in New England whose local governance was democratic and which contributed to the democratic development of the United States ;  although these local assemblies had some small amounts of devolved power, the ultimate authority was held by the Crown and the English Parliament.
The evidence of this argument is Taiwan, a democratic country who put Confucianism value as the moral value of the country, to sustain its democracy. Then, justice is done to perfection in a democracy.
Dictatorship can be further sub-classified into military dictatorship, civil-military dictatorship, one party state system, personalist or hybrid government system.
Censorship, propaganda and media blackouts are often cited as problematic issues in dictatorships, because it is important that the people living under the government not get too many ideas from sources that contradict their leader. Differences among dictatorial regimes are rooted on different aspects of their performance.
A State of emergency was declared in France due to the civil unrest[[http: Basics Democracy is defined as a government of the people, for the people, and by the people.
All of these dictators remained in power for many years, but that should come as no surprise, according to research by Georgy Egorov. Dictator never answers to anyone as he possesses the absolute authority and power to govern.
It is purely the system of authoritarianism where the selected politicians of the public set the all public and private behavior in the country.
That means people have the say in deciding what to do. There are two clear examples we provided, that the opposition failed to refute, and even conceded. This makes sense if you consider how current government officials choose new people to join them in leadership positions. Dictatorship only succeed in implementing whatever policies they have in mind without opposition.
Thus we have provided a system that is acceptable and useful to overcome difficulties, is willing and able achieve development, and is flexible and timely for doing so vs a system that can not properly function in a society not fully developed, and that hinders development, if judged on whether dictatorship has been proven to be the best path for development, the proposition team wins.
As for the comparison with the Soviet Union, in which we established that for a given dictatorship in crisis it was better to liberalize the economy than to democratize, seeing as how China had a better growth rate than its neighbor, and also how its neighbor collapsed and dissolved, unable to; the opposition did not refute this.
Their situations were similar up until the Perestroika times, when they engaged on parallel but different initiatives to break from classical Communism. On top of this, the opposition performed a highly inconsistent classification of regimes, taking the big happy family of one party Communist regimes: An election cannot be measured or compared with the capital they take.
The miracles that happened seems fail to serve the ends of the development, including the freedom of the citizens.
Hence, the evidence given was irrelevant to the argument. An election is a good indicator on how the government has performed and its future within the country. When the results of the election are very close, there is a chance of anarchy whilst the votes are recounted.
Nationalism system remains at top priority in dictatorship while in democracy system the focus of government remains more on privatization system.
This may lead to other forms of government appearing to be more progressive, and more eager to embrace new things. China went on with large and increasing economic liberties, but established no political rights or liberties.
It also outlines the laws that govern the private property as well.
Despite the fact that democratic system of government is gradually increasing in the country still the many countries like to adopt the system of dictatorial government. That the citizens have money he can extort. A dictator is a leader who possesses exceptional talent in the fields of organization, and administration, and is also able to act decisively and without fear of dissenting opinions.
How the government reacts to these unexpected changes, and whether or not they bend to the will of the people has a lot to do with those in power at the time. Apart from this, both teams have agreed that it is economic and social development what leads to democratic demands from the citizens.
As a result, if you are unhappy over something in a democracy there is always a chance to change it and set it right so that it can make you happy, finally. But, in democracy, it is the rule of the people.
This is another important difference between democracy and dictatorship. The former contributes to development of the individuals as well as the society, while the latter has many wrongs such as there is ruthless oppression of people or there might be flawed decision-making, which may ultimately lead the country towards ruin.
Most of the modern societies, even liberal democratic systems have states of emergency, states of siege, or martial law to deal with catastrophes, crisis and threats.Inafter the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so.
Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy. May 29, · Where a democracy is based upon allowing the people to govern the land via majority rules voting, a dictatorship takes any and all influence away of the general population, and instead places it all in the hands of a single, absolute ultimedescente.com: Jessicaheichel.
In today's world, democracy is considered to be the best form of government, reason being that people are treated equally and have full rights to live a life of their liking. In a dictatorship, people are literally treated like cattle and are expected to simply obey and follow the government.
democracy or dictatorship, which is best for economic development Economic Development: Economic Development refers to the increase in standard of living in a nation's population with sustained growth from a simple, low-income economy to a modern, high-income economy. In a democracy, the country could adapt because the economic geniuses could be elected to office.
But if the country is a dictatorship, the generals would still be in power and would be ineffective in the face of the new crisis. The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
Niels Bohr Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.Download