For instance, if we start teaching our youth gradually that communism is good and capitalism has a lot of faults, we would see a major change in how elections go and how much of a political swing it would cause Reply.
Ultimately, Fitzgerald is correct inasmuch as what she calls "perfect objectivity" is unattainable, and each generation of historians, whose work filters into textbooks, will view history through a lens somewhat colored by their own contemporary concerns.
She makes it clear early on that David Muzzey and his contemporaries were Progressives, and that Harold Rugg had considerably more advanced ideas.
Although thin and schematic, America Revised holds up reasonably well until the author comes to the period she is most interested in, the years since That Carter elected to whip us with Lasch says far more about the agitated state of mind in his White House than it does about the state of the Union.
I agree with her that the way history textbooks are written has a major impact upon the students and how they perceive history.
The DAR protested against the deemphasis of American military history. Do people of color, whose history has been underrepresented in our textbooks, take a negative view of the way that history is changing?
For in an admittedly bad time for the United States, some audiences automatically seem to assume that if a book takes a dim view of American life, it cannot be wrong. The English historian of American history, J.
They also were implacably upbeat. I agree with a lot of what she is saying. There was, in fact, considerable diversity of opinion in the textbooks of the period. Yes, like Collin said, Fitzgerald maintains both a personal and objective point of view, but the way that she writes is quite dynamic.
Eventually, many texts acquired, in addition to multiple authors, a general editor, an editorial adviser, and a clutch of consultants. Alas, Miss FitzGerald never gets within ten miles of this sort of analysis. He is a minor character now. The warning signal that the era of diversity was ending came inwith the sudden and simultaneous attack on the Rugg series by the Advertising Federation of America, the National Association of Manufacturers, and the American Legion.
Traditional faiths have given way to sentimentality. She builds her case against a conformist historiography entirely on content analysis.
For the first time in publishing history, large-scale protests were heard from liberal organizations and from racial and ethnic minorities—black Americans, Mexican Americans, American Indians, Puerto Ricans, and so on. The mayor of Chicago and the Hearst press accused a number of texts of Anglophilism.
As for the argument Miss FitzGerald makes, it is so inaccurate as to raise the question of whether she actually has read many of the textbooks she mentions, or has simply managed to deceive herself about what they contain.
Academic historians were invited to collaborate with schoolteachers or school administrators, preferably from another region of the country. Roosevelt became President, the country was full of suffering. Inthe Rugg books had soldcopies; insales came to a mere 21, copies; not long thereafter, the books disappeared.
The entire essay is about the pessimistic views of history acquired by new generations. The trouble with our society, it turns out, is that it has lost its rigor. Students are increasingly learning or should be learning the skills to make sense of the past as much as the past is revealed.
By and large, American historians of today no longer write narrative history. This is why she says that textbooks increasingly portray the I also like how you included your on experience with history in order to agree with her point.
Through this triumph he changed into a man who well knew and well understood sorrow and suffering.The American Past America Revised: History School-Books in the Twentieth Century.
by Frances Fitzgerald. Atlantic-Little, Brown. pp. $ One of. Frances analysis american essay rewriting fitzgerald history. Intermedio, Virgilio Borobio Thrombin essay on human life and environment - Physiology analysis rewriting fitzgerald american frances essay history and Disease, Michael E.
Section 4. Section 1. (George W. Frances FItzgerald "Reading American History" "Rewriting American History" concerns how history is represented to modern readers. Based on your own experiences with history textbooks, do you share. Frances FitzGerald is an American journalist and historian, who is primarily known for Fire in the Lake: The Vietnamese and the Americans in Vietnam, an account of the Vietnam War.
It was a bestseller that won the Pulitzer Prize. Frances Fitzgerald (Born in ) is an American journalist and author. She won the Pulitzer Prize for a book she wrote about the Vietnam War. This is. An Analysis of Rewriting American History by Frances Fitzgerald PAGES 2.
WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. - Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA.
Wow. Most helpful essay resource ever!Download